Thursday, July 31, 2008

YouGov Survey Results

I will make this post pretty straight forward: please take a look below at the following questions and results taken from the latest YouGov Select survey and which you'll agree, speaks absolute volumes.

Please feel free to comment!

(YouGov polls are rated one of the most, if not the most accurate against all other professional research and consulting organisations:)

"On yesterday's survey, more than half (65%) of the respondents strongly agree that the perpetrator should spend the rest of his/ her life in prison when given life sentence.
Moreover, respondents are generally more sympathetic with the vulnerable victims and believe that those victims who suffered from sexual abuse and killed their perpetrators should not face mandatory life sentence."

The sentence for murder is life in prison, do you agree or disagree with the following statements

Life should mean 'life' (i.e. the perpetrator should spend the rest of his/her life in prison)

Strongly agree 65%

Agree somewhat 21%

Neither agree nor disagree 4.3%

Disagree somewhat 6%

Strongly disagree 2.7%


Life should be 25 years in prison

Strongly agree 18.3%

Agree somewhat 25.9%

Neither agree nor disagree 13.8%

Disagree somewhat 18%

Strongly disagree 22%

The death sentence for murder should be reinstated

Strongly agree 34.9%

Agree somewhat 19%

Neither agree nor disagree 9.3%

Disagree somewhat 7.6%

Strongly disagree 26.5%

Looking at the scenarios below do you think the perpetrator should face a mandatory life sentence?

The mother of a rape victim who kills a man she catches raping her daughter

Yes 11.4%

No 80.7%

After a long-running dispute between neighbours, one of them kills the other

Yes 71.2%

No 16.9%


A husband kills his wife who was an alcoholic and swore at him. He killed her by repeatedly kicking her in the stomach while she was drunk

Yes 81.2%

No 11.7%


A rape victim who kills her attacker after he taunts her

Yes 14.3%

No 77.4%

A prostitute stabs her pimp after suffering months of physical, sexual and emotional abuse

Yes 17.7%

No 71.7%

Saturday, July 19, 2008

CCTV Cities.......Wigan


Anyone who watched Channel 5's CCTV Cities last Monday evening, a documentary covering a few weeks in the lives of the CCTV operators and police in action in Wigan, would surely not have been shocked to see the level of violence, debauchery and drug abuse, that infests our towns and cities the length and breadth of this once great nation.

If you were indeed shocked by any of the crimes or scenes shown in this documentary, then I'm afraid the liberal tinted glasses that you wear, must have been well and truly affixed to that stupid head of yours!

What should have shocked the viewers was indeed the lax sentencing (or, lack of sentencing) handed down to these louts, drug pushers and attempted murderers!

The documentary showed many arrests for an assortment of crimes picked up by the CCTV operators and subsequently radioed to the police on the streets. There was the 'girly' fighter who pleaded "dunt tell mi mumm, wil yur not" who got a slap on the wrist by the courts. Then the big bruiser, caught distributing and snorting coke, who pleaded with the arresting police officers to give him an on-the-spot fine, pleading that he'd willingly pay £80 for the privilege, "ahh c'mon mate, it's Mad Friday, let us goer for eighty quid, pal" The chap was later given a £60 fine and a caution for possession and distribution of cocaine.

Then there was another drug pusher, whom the CCTV operators had been watching for a number of weeks for his alleged distribution of drugs in and around Wigan town centre, and even though he was caught on camera passing the drugs via mouth to mouth with a female 'reveller' he was subsequently aquitted by the law courts for lack of evidence! Lack of bloody evidence, I bleeding ask you!


We then had the pleasure of watching some potential petrol bomber who had a grudge against some nightclub in Tyldesley, ride up on his motorcycle and began to squirt an accelerant at the facia of the club, but! (LOL) as the chap was using a 'throwing action' to disperse the liquid, he (LOL) was also unbeknowst covering himself with it, and when he lit the match (LOL) was indeed engulfed. This could have been a lot worse as a passing pedestrian nearly found out who just managed to escaped the flames when the maniac lit the match. The police are still searching for the lunatic who managed to 'abscond' singed and with a red hot motorcycle in tow?

But, here comes the crux of my post regarding this documentary! A bunch of young males are seen on camera to be involved in a little set-to, nothing too untoward you might think, then one of the males produces a knife and lunges at one of his foes involved in the fracas, the blade just missing him within inches, and mainly thanks to one of his cowardly (or, maybe not) mates who happened to pull the knifeman just before impact! The ferocity in which the cowardly bastard threw his knife holding hand would have surely resulted in serious if not near fatal consequences! But, the knifeman wasn't content, he then produced another knife and with one in each hand began to chase after his potential victim, only failing in his efforts when the cowardly bastard slipped on the wet surface of the road! The police 'duly' arrived and although the knifeman tried to hide the blades under the police car, he was subsequently arrested!

So, what did the potential 'killer' get in the way of a punishment? 12 MONTHS SUSPENDED! Yep, that's what he got, just 12 months suspended! Could it be, that in the knifemans favour his own ethnicity and that as a somebody who is of a 'black' origin and indeed living in Wigan come to his rescue? Are you therefore automatically exempt from the true arm of the law (if there is such a thing nowadays!) if you are 'black?' Did Mr Elliot Brown stand and represent this young cowardly bastard? Who knows ? I certainly never read about this incident in the local 'liberal' rag! Did I miss the account of these events in the papers, or was it just that this report was excluded from publication for some other reasons? Would the local media have written a report on this incident had it been say, some 'white' indigenous local thug trying to attack an individual of a different colour, race or creed with two knives?

That said, I do recall a sandwich board belonging to the Wigan Observer round about that time, with the headline 'local youth in racist abuse trial' but, only to find that the banner headline in the paper was refering to that of some young man who had been given a 12 months suspended sentence, a three month curfew and fined £270 for calling a shopkeeper a 'PAKI!' I wonder what colour of skin that young 'evil' bastard had?

Friday, July 18, 2008

Absolutely Ludicrous.........! I'm Totally Speechless

Please take a look at these two following articles taken from the Bolton News. This coming after the recent fatal stabbing of Mr Paul Gilligan.

Police trawl town streets in hunt for weapon used in stabbing

SPECIALIST police officers took to the streets in search of the weapon used in the fatal stabbing of Paul Gilligan.
The 31-year-old father, from Little Hulton, was killed during a night out in Bolton town centre.
A post-mortem examination revealed he received two stab wounds, one to the chest and one to the shoulder, in an incident in the Pepper Alley pub in Crown Street, just after 12.50am on Sunday.

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/boltonnews/3214194.Police_trawl_town_streets_in_hunt_for_weapon_used_in_stabbing/

Police tell man to throw away knife he found in Bolton street

Engineer Dave MacDonald expected a swift response from the police when he found a discarded knife on his way to work in Bolton.
But a switchboard call-handler at
Greater Manchester Police told Mr MacDonald that officers did not have the time to collect the knife — and asked him to dispose of it himself.


http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/boltonnews/3213734.Police_tell_man_to_throw_away_knife_he_found_in_Bolton_street/

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Mark Steyn on Great Britain, Europe and Multiculturalism....





Check him out on you tube! One or two good ones to be watched.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Andy Burnham talks about MPs' expenses

MP Andy Burnham

In response to last weeks vote to keep their snouts in the trough, Leigh MP Andy 'greedy bastard' Burnham, gave his own riposte to the criticism that he believes was 'unjust.'

Having read Mr Burnham's article, written exclusively for the Leigh Journal and Leigh Reporter, I must admit to reaching for the tissues................................to mop up the dinner that I'd just regurgitated over the dining table! Unfortunately, this bile you are about to read, will have the sheeple of Leigh, swooning over such a honest (sic) and heartfelt piece from our wonderful 'pig' of a MP. "What a lovely man he is?"


"I'm not really bothered about what the national Press says about me, but I am concerned that local people know the true story," he said this week. (Ed: of course you are concerned.)

"Like most MPs, I voted last week for MPs' pay to be pegged to pay for other public sector workers, and for this be the last time that we vote on our own pay.
"But, on MPs' expenses, I voted against suggested reforms. As this has led to criticism in the media, I wanted my own constituents to know why I voted in the way that I did.
(Ed: Tissues out ready!)
"The vote related to what is called the Additional Costs Allowance. This is an allowance available to all non-London MPs up to a maximum of £24,000 a year to cover the extra costs of living in London four days a week and away from home.
"Generally, it is up to each MP how much to claim and what to claim for. All MPs' circumstances are different so claims vary. But many MPs - including me - do not claim up to this maximum.
(Ed: But, many do Mr Burnham!)

"The proposed reform would not have altered the maximum that could be claimed. Instead, it would have changed how claims are made. It would have restricted the range of items that could be claimed (stopping claims for furniture, for instance) but replaced it with a general daily living allowance of £30 for all MPs (paid without receipts).


"Firstly, let me assure you that my vote against this plan was neither a vote for more money nor to keep the ability to claim 'luxury items'. I hope my own record on claiming the ACA allowance will bear this out. (Ed: I believe you!)

"I have always kept my ACA claims to a minimum, and have only claimed for things that I consider to be an unavoidable extra cost of the job I do.
"Since the last Election, I have never claimed even close to this maximum amount under the ACA. Indeed, in the financial year just ended, I claimed £10,503 under the ACA. This is less than half of the total amount available and one of the lowest ACA claims by any MP.
"My reason for rejecting the new plan was because I didn't think a £30 daily allowance was right or better than the existing system.
(Ed: Of Course Andy)


"I felt it would be less transparent as it would not be directly linked to actual costs incurred. And, because it was a set allowance, I was worried it could lead to the criticism that MPs had begun to claim more was than was needed. For instance, the new system would probably have lead to my own ACA claims increasing. (Ed: Choke!)

"I must point out that I was not voting against any change. I acknowledge that there needs to be reform of MPs' expenses to rebuild public confidence. But I concluded that these were not the right reforms. (Ed: Yeah! Okay 'piggy' boy!)

"Better plans should now be drawn up to respond to the issues that I and others have raised and presented to the House as soon as possible. But, until those changes come, I would be happy to answer any questions about the claims I make or provide any further information to my constituents. (Ed: I'll be dropping you a line in due course Andy, my old china.)

"I have always said that it is a privilege to do this job. I also acknowledge that I am well paid and make no complaints about that. But I hope people will know me well enough by now to know that I did not come into it for the money or the perks." (Ed: Boo Bloody Hoo)

"So there you have it! All is forgiven Mr Andy 'greedy bastard' Burnham, sorry for doubting your true integrity!"

"Pass me those bloody tissues will you please."

http://www.leighjournal.co.uk/news/leighnews/3203388.Andy_Burnham_talks_about_MPs__expenses/

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Our MP Andy Burnham Gives a Big **** You 'I'm alright Jack!'


Leigh MP Andy Burnham

Leigh MP and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Andy 'greedy bastard' Burnham gave a massive two fingered salute to all of his hard working and hard pressed constituents, by joining the other 145 'Honourable Labour' (172 across all parties)Members of Parliament and additionally the other 32 Ministers who voted in favour of keeping their noses in the trough to keep the second home allowance (ACA), and which allows MPs to buy items on the “John Lewis list” without question and to retain certain other “perks” that we could only dream of acquiring in our lifetime!

A 'greedy bastard' pig
As the 'credit crunch' and fuel 'crisis' bites hard into our ordinary daily lives we are forced to tighten our belts and make sacrifices just so we can put food on the table and clothe our children, these pigs continue to show such contempt for the honest, decent and hardworking amongst us!

Just how anyone can continue to support a ruling government (and an unelected Prime Minister,) that is hell-bent on bringing this country to it's knees is beyond comprehension. I feel this government know that it's on it's last legs and it's a case of 'grab what you can' whilst we've still got the opportunity! Unfortunately, other than the British National Party, there is little in the way of an alternative politically, and the signs are clearly appearing that we indeed are now in a position to capitalise and utilise our postion as a political force to be reckoned with! We just
can't afford to take our foot of the pedal!
More MP's at Thursdays vote in Parliament!

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Wigan Metro 'Couple' In Court On Serious Fraud Charges!

A husband and wife team have both appeared in court on suspicion of serious fraud charges.

John and Nadine Wakelam who both held prominent positions for the council are accused of obtaining in the region of £180,000 from their employers.

Nadine Wakelam 39, who worked in the councils Adult Services Department as Service Manager for Administration and Financial Services was charged with fraud by abuse of position between January 15, 2007 and November 16, 2007. Additionally, she was charged with obtaining property by deception between October 20, 2003 and January 14, 2007 .


Her husband John Wakelam 38, the councils Assistant Accountant for Education, was charged with two counts of money laundering.The couple, of Somerton Close, Standish, will appear before Wigan Magistrates on Thursday, August 21, for a committal hearing before being sent to Liverpool Crown Court.

A Picture showing what Mr and Mrs Wakelam may look like?

These new fraud allegations follow only a year on from when another council employee was charged with dishonestly obtaining over £28,000 in incapacity benefit over a four-year period despite also working for Wigan Council.

Quote: The 56-year-old had been earning between £300 and £1,100 while still claiming from the government, the court was told. Teresa Loftus, prosecuting, said: "She continued to claim benefits after she had returned to work."For almost four years, money was being paid into her account while she was earning, on average, £700 a month with the council."Abbott was only caught out when the council decided to do random checks on staff and her crime came to light.

Ms. Abbott was employed as a Senior Officer in Wigan Council's Chief Executives department and was also the GMB union convenor. Ms Abbott additionally held the Wigan Constituency Labour Party Chair. She was also a very prominent figure actively helping our local Labour MP's Mr Andy Burnham and Mr Neil Turner, as well as holding many past and present roles, including being chair of Wigan and Leigh United Against Racism!

So it's pretty clear Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council is corrupt to the bleeding core, but, that's not entirely surprising. Not only do they harbour criminals of the highest calibre, they also employ and gloat over RACIST BIGOTS like Mr Elliot Brown in this anti-British, anti -white and pro-multicultural cabal.