One of the main arguments that our opponents eagerly attack the rise of the BNP with: is that they say, 'we play on peoples fears.'
It is my own experience of the BNP, and this very much since their policies in general, had attracted me away from the comfort zone of the 'mainstream' political parties and the Labour Party in particular, was primarily due to the honesty amongst the British National Party policies and it's direction. They didn't play on my fears, they acknowledged them and have an answer for them. Is there any reason why more people shouldn't listen to what the BNP have to say? Or, is this in itself a fear factor: generated by those who are worried the most?
Those of you outside the realms of the British National Party, will be pretty oblivious to the under-handed tactics deployed by the 'straight' Lib/Lab/Con dynasty that has colluded to defraud the British public into believing everything is fine and dandy in our beautiful, honest and democratic society, led by a band of upstanding enforcers of true British dignity.
http://liarsbuggersandthieves.blogspot.com/
Yet, they constantly meddle and invade other nations affairs that serve no purpose to ourselves, and that our own Government and with a nod and a wink from the other parties, can wholeheartedly label these countries as a 'Banana Republic' and very often, forgetting to look in their own mirror, and thus ...!
Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones!
"The UK electoral system is not fit for purpose because it is too easy to create fake voter registrations.
Election commissioner Richard Mawrey QC made the comment as he described postal voting on demand as "lethal to the democratic process", and said the current system means "wholesale electoral fraud is both easy and profitable".
Very much in relation to the above comments, I have been in contact with my Wigan counterparts and asked if I could indeed share with my readers the exact copy of the letter sent by my Wigan colleagues in ensuring that no under-handed tactics were indeed used or to be used in defrauding the borough's inhabitants, regarding the up and coming Local Elections.
In addition, I have also spoken to quite a number of people within my own ward to take photographs of their own postal vote in case we need to use this at a later date if required to do so. I suggest you all do the same!
http://wiganbnp.blogspot.com/ Monday, 14 April 2008
Post-May 1st postal voting investigation.
Posted here as an open letter is a copy of an email I sent to the electoral registration office less than an hour ago. I will do what I've said I'll do. And I do have a fourth, as yet unrevealed, question.
Sirs
Between one and two weeks after the May 1st elections, I will be entering a request for information, to the FoI officer, under the Freedom of Information Act. I will be requesting the following information:
1. How many ADDRESSES within the bounds of W.M.B.C. were registered for one postal vote (names being irrelevant)?How many addresses were registered for two postal votes?How many addresses were registered for three postal votes?Etc.up to ten or more postal votes for the same address.
2. How many NAMES within the bounds of W.M.B.C.were registered for two postal votes, at different addresses?
How many names were registered for three postal votes at different addresses?
Etc. up to ten or more postal votes for the same name.
3. What is the total for the number of registered electors within the boundaries of W.M.B.C., and what was the total number of registered postal votes?
I understand that addresses such as old people's homes, hospitals etc. will have multiple requests from one address. These I will check for status and, where appropriate, exclude from investigation. For other addresses I will be making a personal judgement on how many repeats are "reasonable".
I also understand that in a population of more than 300,000 people, some names will be repeated, therefore I will be making a personal judgement on how many repeats for one name are "reasonable".
Any information regarding multiple postal votes at one address not an old people's home or hospital, or multiple same-names at different addresses, that seems suspicious to me, I will be taking to the police for further investigation.
I will not be requesting the actual addresses or names - only numbers; so issues of confidentiality will not enter into things as far as this request will be concerned. Such things will only enter into things if - if - the police become involved.The information requested will be easy to collate, and virtually cost-free. I think it safe to assume that such information as all requests granted for postal votes are kept on an electronic database. I further assume that this will be Microsoft Office Access, or similar. All you need to do is highlight the "Address" column on the database and click "Sort Ascending" (or "Sort Descending" - the effects will be the same ... just in the opposite direction). Then read through the addresses and count the number of times the same address appears consecutively, as it will automatically do.
For the names, just repeat this procedure; highlight the "Names" column, click "Sort Ascending" or "Sort Descending", then read through the names and count the number of times the same name comes up consecutively, as it will automatically do.This way you will very easily be able to find how many times each address has appeared and how many times each name has appeared.
I am educated and qualified in the office-use of computers to RSA IBT2 level. I am fully aware of what can be done with word processors, spreadsheets and databases.I will leave the request for information for one-two weeks after the election because I fully understand that for you the work involved in an election is not over with the election itself. I will give you time to get your extra work done without distractions from the likes of me.
I am forwarding this mail to you to give you advance warning that the requests will be made, and for you to prepare for them, if necessary. I will also be posting this mail as an open letter on the Wigan BNP weblog.
Our politicians have created a postal voting system that is wide open to electoral fraud, as has been seen from numerous cases around the country. The politicians themselves don't appear to be motivated to do anything about it, so it is left to ordinary members of the public such as me, who ARE motivated to do something about it, to do it on their behalf. I apologise if this causes you extra work, but please, don't blame me: blame the politicians.
I have no personal doubts about the integrity of the electoral registration office itself. It has been by a country mile the most helpful, friendly and informative department of any governmental - local and national - department I have ever encountered in my 55 years of life.
Sincerely
Henry Morgan
PS There will also be a fourth request for information, in addition to the three detailed above. However, I do not yet wish to make known what that request will be. The information will be easier to gather than that described above, and possibly far more indicative of possible electoral fraud and how deeply into our local political system it reaches. Assuming it is there at all, of course, which is by no means certain here in Wigan. There is no record at all of what this fourth request will be on my computer, or written down anywhere. So if any corrupt politician or political activist, or council officer sends heavies around to confiscate my computer and root through it, along with rooting through all my papers, in order to obtain advance warning, then that will be a waste of time and effort, and indeed,counter-productive ... because I am well plugged into the Web and have contacts nation-and-world-wide
It is my own experience of the BNP, and this very much since their policies in general, had attracted me away from the comfort zone of the 'mainstream' political parties and the Labour Party in particular, was primarily due to the honesty amongst the British National Party policies and it's direction. They didn't play on my fears, they acknowledged them and have an answer for them. Is there any reason why more people shouldn't listen to what the BNP have to say? Or, is this in itself a fear factor: generated by those who are worried the most?
Those of you outside the realms of the British National Party, will be pretty oblivious to the under-handed tactics deployed by the 'straight' Lib/Lab/Con dynasty that has colluded to defraud the British public into believing everything is fine and dandy in our beautiful, honest and democratic society, led by a band of upstanding enforcers of true British dignity.
http://liarsbuggersandthieves.blogspot.com/
Yet, they constantly meddle and invade other nations affairs that serve no purpose to ourselves, and that our own Government and with a nod and a wink from the other parties, can wholeheartedly label these countries as a 'Banana Republic' and very often, forgetting to look in their own mirror, and thus ...!
Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones!
"The UK electoral system is not fit for purpose because it is too easy to create fake voter registrations.
Election commissioner Richard Mawrey QC made the comment as he described postal voting on demand as "lethal to the democratic process", and said the current system means "wholesale electoral fraud is both easy and profitable".
Very much in relation to the above comments, I have been in contact with my Wigan counterparts and asked if I could indeed share with my readers the exact copy of the letter sent by my Wigan colleagues in ensuring that no under-handed tactics were indeed used or to be used in defrauding the borough's inhabitants, regarding the up and coming Local Elections.
In addition, I have also spoken to quite a number of people within my own ward to take photographs of their own postal vote in case we need to use this at a later date if required to do so. I suggest you all do the same!
http://wiganbnp.blogspot.com/ Monday, 14 April 2008
Post-May 1st postal voting investigation.
Posted here as an open letter is a copy of an email I sent to the electoral registration office less than an hour ago. I will do what I've said I'll do. And I do have a fourth, as yet unrevealed, question.
Sirs
Between one and two weeks after the May 1st elections, I will be entering a request for information, to the FoI officer, under the Freedom of Information Act. I will be requesting the following information:
1. How many ADDRESSES within the bounds of W.M.B.C. were registered for one postal vote (names being irrelevant)?How many addresses were registered for two postal votes?How many addresses were registered for three postal votes?Etc.up to ten or more postal votes for the same address.
2. How many NAMES within the bounds of W.M.B.C.were registered for two postal votes, at different addresses?
How many names were registered for three postal votes at different addresses?
Etc. up to ten or more postal votes for the same name.
3. What is the total for the number of registered electors within the boundaries of W.M.B.C., and what was the total number of registered postal votes?
I understand that addresses such as old people's homes, hospitals etc. will have multiple requests from one address. These I will check for status and, where appropriate, exclude from investigation. For other addresses I will be making a personal judgement on how many repeats are "reasonable".
I also understand that in a population of more than 300,000 people, some names will be repeated, therefore I will be making a personal judgement on how many repeats for one name are "reasonable".
Any information regarding multiple postal votes at one address not an old people's home or hospital, or multiple same-names at different addresses, that seems suspicious to me, I will be taking to the police for further investigation.
I will not be requesting the actual addresses or names - only numbers; so issues of confidentiality will not enter into things as far as this request will be concerned. Such things will only enter into things if - if - the police become involved.The information requested will be easy to collate, and virtually cost-free. I think it safe to assume that such information as all requests granted for postal votes are kept on an electronic database. I further assume that this will be Microsoft Office Access, or similar. All you need to do is highlight the "Address" column on the database and click "Sort Ascending" (or "Sort Descending" - the effects will be the same ... just in the opposite direction). Then read through the addresses and count the number of times the same address appears consecutively, as it will automatically do.
For the names, just repeat this procedure; highlight the "Names" column, click "Sort Ascending" or "Sort Descending", then read through the names and count the number of times the same name comes up consecutively, as it will automatically do.This way you will very easily be able to find how many times each address has appeared and how many times each name has appeared.
I am educated and qualified in the office-use of computers to RSA IBT2 level. I am fully aware of what can be done with word processors, spreadsheets and databases.I will leave the request for information for one-two weeks after the election because I fully understand that for you the work involved in an election is not over with the election itself. I will give you time to get your extra work done without distractions from the likes of me.
I am forwarding this mail to you to give you advance warning that the requests will be made, and for you to prepare for them, if necessary. I will also be posting this mail as an open letter on the Wigan BNP weblog.
Our politicians have created a postal voting system that is wide open to electoral fraud, as has been seen from numerous cases around the country. The politicians themselves don't appear to be motivated to do anything about it, so it is left to ordinary members of the public such as me, who ARE motivated to do something about it, to do it on their behalf. I apologise if this causes you extra work, but please, don't blame me: blame the politicians.
I have no personal doubts about the integrity of the electoral registration office itself. It has been by a country mile the most helpful, friendly and informative department of any governmental - local and national - department I have ever encountered in my 55 years of life.
Sincerely
Henry Morgan
PS There will also be a fourth request for information, in addition to the three detailed above. However, I do not yet wish to make known what that request will be. The information will be easier to gather than that described above, and possibly far more indicative of possible electoral fraud and how deeply into our local political system it reaches. Assuming it is there at all, of course, which is by no means certain here in Wigan. There is no record at all of what this fourth request will be on my computer, or written down anywhere. So if any corrupt politician or political activist, or council officer sends heavies around to confiscate my computer and root through it, along with rooting through all my papers, in order to obtain advance warning, then that will be a waste of time and effort, and indeed,counter-productive ... because I am well plugged into the Web and have contacts nation-and-world-wide
No comments:
Post a Comment